- August 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- February 2013
- December 2012
- August 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- January 2012
- November 2011
Please join me in congratulating our new Sociology of Development section officers!
Chair Elect: Andrew Jorgenson
New Council Members: Kristy Kelly and Poulami Roychowdhury
New Graduate Student Council Representative: Ryan Nehring
Thanks to everyone who was willing to run and serve–your participation is the foundation that keeps our section strong and growing.
With best wishes,
Wow, wow, wow! Click on the Sectors Newsletters tab to access the spring edition of SECTORS, our Sociology of Development newsletter. It is packed with information about Sociology of Development events, publications, and people. This edition also contains a complete guide to Development-related events and sessions at the 2017 ASA Annual Meeting.
Please join me in thanking Svetla Dimitrova and Kelly Birch Maginot, our talented newsletter editors, for their tremendous work in putting this together.
Michigan State University invites the submission of article-length manuscripts (6,000 – 9,000 words) for peer review and publication in our GPID Working Papers series. We seek materials at a late stage of formulation that contribute new understandings of women and men’s roles and relations amidst social, economic, and political change in the developing world. The goals of GPID are: (1) to promote research that contributes to gendered analysis of social change, (2) to highlight the effects of international development policy and globalization on gender roles and gender relations, and (3) to encourage new approaches to international development policy and programming.
GPID cross-cuts disciplines, bringing together research, critical analyses, and proposals for change. Individual papers in the series address a range of topics, such as gender, violence, and human rights; gender and agriculture; reproductive health and healthcare; gender and social movements; masculinities and development; and the gendered division of labor. We particularly encourage manuscripts that bridge the gap between research, policy, and practice. Accepted papers are individually printed for distribution as well as published online. We are an open access publication, and previously published papers can be viewed at http://gencen.isp.msu.edu/publications/papers/. You can also follow us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/gpidworkingpapers/.
If you are interested in submitting a manuscript to the series, please send a 150-word abstract summarizing the paper’s essential points and findings to Dr. Amy Jamison, Editor, and Kelly Birch Maginot, Managing Editor, at email@example.com. If the abstract suggests your paper is suitable for the GPID Working Papers, the full paper will be invited for peer review and publication consideration.
WP #307 Competing Gender Perspectives in Security Sector Reforms in Turkey, by Sabine Mannitz, Peace Research Institute Frankfurt, and Stephanie Reckhaus, Mainz Institute for Social Pedagogic Research
Abstract: Since the 1990s, the human security norm has contributed to reframing the discourse and practice surrounding Security Sector Reforms (SSR). People-centered security thinking brings vulnerable groups into the center of attention and declares gender-sensitive approaches to be crucial. However, while the inclusion of gender perspectives into SSR may seem perfectly logical in the theory, it creates dilemmas in practice: Who represents whom? How should SSR programs involve women (and which ones)? Should women’s organizations cooperate with state institutions that regularly fail to protect women at all? A study of local women’s rights organizations in Turkey illustrates that there cannot be just one definition of women’s security needs. The diversity of female life-worlds leads to public contestations surrounding the right forms of representation. It is, however, essential to recognize that such conflicts are important contributions in the evolution of localized gender security norms. The article draws on fieldwork with Turkish women’s organizations and expert interviews carried out in 2013 and 2014.
WP #308 Empowering Women for Food and Income Security: The Case of Pigeon Pea in Malawi, by Nathalie Me-Nsope and Michelle Larkins, Michigan State University
Abstract: Legume-intensified maize systems have been identified as a potential “one stop” solution to the problem of food insecurity in Malawi. Previous research has failed to examine how gender relations and intra-household dynamics may influence decisions and potential food security gains at the farm level, or how gender may impact participation, performance, and benefits at later value chain stages. We identify gender-based constraints and opportunities along the chain and their implications for household level food security and poverty. We find the decision to adopt/expand pigeon pea at the farm level; the ability to participate at the various nodes of the value chain; and control over the gains derived from value chain participation are influenced by intra-household gendered patterns of resource allocation, the gendered division of roles and responsibilities, and differential power relations in decision-making between men and women. For example, lack of transportation assets and cultural restrictions on women’s mobility limit their participation in markets, affecting their access to and control over income derived from legume sales. Our findings must be taken into account by development efforts targeting food, income, and nutrition security via the development of legume value chains. We argue that empowering women economically is essential for harvesting the potential food security and poverty reduction benefits of legume expansion and commercialization.
Working Paper #309 On the Frontlines of Health Care: Xhosa Nurses in South Africa’s Rural Ciskei, 1960s-1980s, by Leslie Anne Hadfield, Brigham Young University
Abstract: The work and history of female Xhosa nurses in the Ciskei region of South Africa’s Eastern Cape has largely been ignored by scholars; yet, the region has the longest history of training African professional nurses in South Africa and it is representative of rural or “homeland” health care. The purpose of this article is to highlight the important role these nurses played in delivering western biomedicine during the dynamic period of the 1960s through the 1980s, by analyzing their successful characteristics and approaches. Based upon archival research and interviews with 67 retired nurses, this article argues that the nurses’ dedication, training, and acknowledgment of “traditional” beliefs contributed to their success. In doing so, the article presents these nurses as an historical example of how women from local communities have been vital to delivering health care and building rural communities.
Problem-Solving Sociology “Ideas Incubator” Grants: Responding to an Automated World
Key contemporary problems, including rising inequality, a shrinking middle class, falling wages, skills mismatch, and the resulting rise of populism, can be traced at least partially to the same cause: significant and rapid advances in technology and innovation.
Advancements in technology and innovation create productivity gains, lower costs, and more aggregate wealth, but also eliminate the need for, or reduce the value of, some existing employment opportunities. This results in less wealth for segments of the population that have trouble adapting, and causes many problems.
We invite scholars to apply for grants to attend a one-day “ideas incubator” workshop at Northwestern University on November 16, 2017, focused on developing proposals for research projects to answer the following question:
How does society need to adjust to the employment changes that improved and new technologies (artificial intelligence, robotics, etc.) will likely bring over the next twenty years?
We will focus on addressing the following questions:
1) How to address the loss of middle-class and working-class jobs and skills mismatch caused by rapid advancements in technology and innovation.
2) How to address the fall in wages in the middle and lower parts of the income distribution, as well as the relative fall in wages in less productive parts of the economy, caused by rapid advancements in technology and innovation.
3) How to address the rise in casual labor caused by rapid advancements in technology and innovation.
4) How to address rising inequality caused by rapid advancements in technology and innovation.
5) How to estimate the potential for significant social disruptions caused by rapid advancements in technology and innovation over the next twenty years.
The workshop will consist of lectures, discussions of readings, and several brainstorming sessions geared to helping participants use sociological theory to shed light on solving these problems, and to use these problems to further sociological theory. The workshop proceeds from the assumption that mitigating critical social problems can be a catalyst for breakthroughs in the basic understanding of society.
Northwestern University will pay for economy-class airfare and two nights’ accommodation in Evanston, IL, plus meals and transportation expenses, for all invited scholars. At the end of the workshop, participants will be invited to submit proposals for research grants to further pursue these questions.
To apply, please submit a c.v., a writing sample of your best work to date (not necessarily on this topic), and a one-page explanation of why you want to take part in this workshop by August 15, 2017 to firstname.lastname@example.org
Scholars at all levels are welcome to apply, but we particularly encourage graduate students in the first three years of their doctoral programs to apply.
Submissions are now being accepted for presentations at the International Sociological Association’s World Congress of Sociology in Toronto, July 15-21, 2018.
Please find below a complete list of sessions sponsored by ISA RC09, the ISA section on Social Transformations and the Sociology of Development, and submit your work! Several of the sessions are organized by section members.
I have also included a call for papers for an interesting RC-49 session organized by section member James Linn.
Link to conference:
ISA RC-09 Sessions
World Congress of Sociology, Toronto, July 15-21, 2018
The Changing Terrain of Aid, Humanitarianism, and Development
Suzan ILCAN, email@example.com, University of Waterloo, Canada Liam SWISS, firstname.lastname@example.org, Memorial University, Canada
(Session in English)
This panel focuses on the practices of aid, humanitarianism, and development. We welcome papers that address (a) the recent changes to aid, humanitarianism, or development, such as the fragmentation of the aid/humanitarian field; violence against humanitarians/aid workers; formation of new border regimes and humanitarian subjectivities; dangerous migrant journeys and deaths at sea or on land; increased xenophobia and protectionism; and, shrinking support for development and humanitarian assistance, and/or (b) the responses to these changes, including novel forms of/actors involved in development and humanitarian assistance, and the establishment of social collectivities for political change, including community organizations, rights-based associations, and social justice groups. We are interested in papers that examine these issues through a range of theoretical and methodological perspectives, and aim to include a diversity of perspectives and scholars in the discussion. Submissions by scholars from the Global South are especially encouraged.
Global Openness or National Foreclosure?
Ulrike M.M. SCHUERKENS, email@example.com, Université Rennes 2 and Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, Paris, France
(Session in English)
In current societies, we can find new conflict lines: national foreclosure or global openness. There is the skepticism of broad population and electoral groups as opposed to the better established groups and the elites, the discomfort related to the consequences of globalization and the increasing success of populist parties. The tendency to foreclosure within the confines of the national state (communitarianism) and the rejection of universal values that the representatives of cosmopolitanism uphold, collide. We see in today’s societies a deep social conflict line and want this session to present and discuss case studies of individual countries, studying with an empirical basis this new conflict line in the actual global era.
Development Cooperation’s Focus on Childhood. Global Visions and Local Realities
Isabelle DANIC, firstname.lastname@example.org, ESO RENNES, France Doris BUEHLER- NIEDERBERGER, email@example.com, University of Wuppertal, Germany (Session in English)
Programs of development cooperation put children in the spotlight and even very young children. But, how do they define children and what is their understanding of good childhood and education? The hypothesis we propose to examine is that the policy for young children is authorized by a discourse on the child’s universal and natural body and development. For older children such assumptions of a universal human development seem less explicit. Still, an amazing worldwide similarity of school institutions and education programs remains. This raises another issue: What do these assumptions include and what are their consequences for local societies and for different groups of children in these societies? What kind of multifaceted realities of children’s lives are they confronted with, in different regions, according to age and to sex? Are the definitions of childhood(s), as organizations of development implement them, suitable for children living in contexts of poverty, and often enough of power relationships, violence, injustice? What are examples of development cooperation programs attempting to be sensitive to local realities and what are their conditions and outcomes? Session organizers welcome contributions addressing a wide range of such programs and local realities: proposals on development cooperation’s vision of childhood, on Southern childhood(s) and on the potential discrepancy and its effects. Organizers will give special attention to contributions who give insight into (differing) understandings of what might be violence children are experiencing and how shall be dealt with it as well.
Discourse, Power, and Development: Turning a Critical Lens on INGOs
Mollie PEPPER, firstname.lastname@example.org, Northeastern University, USA (Session in English)
This panel turns its attention to the International Nongovernmental Organizations that shape development practices. By asking about the discourses, imaginaries, and assemblages of international development work, this panel takes a critical approach to thinking about the role of INGOs. What discourses shape the work of INGOs? How are those discourses created, validated, and perpetuated and what does this tell us about where power lies? What is the effect of these discourses in practice? Considering implications of development discourses for the politics of power in development aid allows for a more critical and reflexive study of international development. A careful interrogation of the construction of the various actors of development and the “needs” that development aid addresses shapes this panel’s discussion to bring us collectively closer to a critical reflection on the roles and work of INGOs.
Political Inequality, Economic Inequality, and Social Transformations Since 1989
Joshua DUBROW, email@example.com, Polish Academy of Sciences, Poland (Session in English)
Over the last thirty years, Europe, North America, and Latin America have seen, to varying forms and extents, major changes to their societies. Within this era, economic inequality has steadily grown within the nations of Europe and North America, while it has declined (though it remains high) within many Latin American countries. Social scientists have documented these changes for thirty years, and in the last decade — spurred by the Global Economic Crisis of 2008 — economic inequality has become a hot political issue. How have governments in these regions of the world addressed economic inequality? How has economic inequality influenced political inequality — defined as structured differences in influence over the decisions made within political processes, and the outcomes of those decisions? What are the consequences of economic and political inequalities for marginalized social and political groups? This session invites papers that explore the nexus of political and economic inequality during periods of intense social transformations over the last thirty years in Europe, North America, and Latin America.
The Governance of Enterprises: Global Approaches and Local Cultures
Ulrike M.M. SCHUERKENS, firstname.lastname@example.org, Université Rennes 2 and Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, France Michel VILLETTE, email@example.com, AgroParisTech, France
(Session in English)
In this session, we seek to explore with evidence the type of management approaches that are practiced in selected countries amidst an increasing but insufficient interpretation of the current situation. There is a need for a clear understanding of how local and international organizations are managed because: i) there is an apparent gap in the literature on management and leadership as most of the recent studies are limited in scope and unconvincing in their theoretical and methodological approaches; ii) decision makers in general and managers in particular of both public and private sector organisations have encountered increasing challenges of having to balance between the demands of a globalising power of business and the requirements of a localising power of culture and politics. The effects of globalisation have been felt throughout the world especially after the 2008 financial crisis and the recent decline in oil prices and revenues from tourism and the complexity of the eminent economic, social and political changes that have very often resulted in contradictory and problematic outcomes, especially where opportunities for development, in terms of labour and raw materials, are available but not properly used. The consequence of this lack of understanding of management is a mere concentration on trying to tackle the symptoms of problems not the roots of the problem.
Social Structures and Inequality. Do Western Concepts Apply Globally?
Dieter NEUBERT, firstname.lastname@example.org, University of Bayreuth, Germany (Session in English)
The current discussion on middle classes in the Global South has placed one of sociology’s core topics – the analysis of social structure and inequality – in the focus of a global sociology. At the same time, this debate shows that the conceptual developments in the social structure debate in sociology are hardly taken into account. The debate on global middle classes is dominated by a simplified notion of class reduced to income. The question whether classes in a Marxian, Weberian or Bourdieuan sense exist is hardly discussed. It is implied that classes are socio- culturally homogenous despite well-known differences with regard to religion, ethnicity or gender and the existence of different lifestyles. Moreover, patterns of intersectionality are hardly recognised. The simple question is: Do Western sociological concepts apply globally? If so, do we find in the Global South or transitional countries similar classes and social groups as in the “West” and how they are they defined? Or is there a need to develop the concepts further to analyse societies in different world regions. The panel invites empirical and conceptual contributions case studies of specific classes or groups or countries as well as comparative studies.
Business Enterprises and Development : Qualitative Approaches and Case Studies
Ulrike M.M. SCHUERKENS, email@example.com, Université Rennes 2 and Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, France
Habibul KHONDKER, firstname.lastname@example.org, Zayed University, United Arab Emirates Michel VILLETTE, email@example.com, AgroParisTech, France
(Session in French, English)
The positive impacts of business enterprises on social and economic development are often alleged by economists, based on statistics, numbers and figures at the macro level. Conversely, the negative impacts such as the exploitation of workers, the destruction of the traditional way of life, the expropriation of the poor, the health and environmental damages have been often documented by sociologists and activists in all parts of the word. In responds to theses critics, large corporations have developed a window dressing strategy. Green washing, social responsibility allegations and others propaganda formula have made the understanding of what is actually going on even more confuse. The aim of this session is to discuss positive as well as negative impacts of business enterprises activities on local development. We expect well documented qualitative observations and cases studies in order to develop a renewed theoretical approach of the contribution of business enterprises to development.
Social Justice in a Turbulent World: South Asia in Focus
Habibul KHONDKER, firstname.lastname@example.org, Zayed University, United Arab Emirates Rukmini SEN, email@example.com, Ambedkar University Delhi, India
(Session in English)
This session will examine social transformation under conditions of lop-sided economic growth in South Asia which is generating a variety of grievances and potential threats to ecological systems and social orders. Social justice has become a major concern for the ordinary people who are losing their rights to land, livelihood and are threatened by a variety of looming ecological crises. Social movements of various sorts have appeared to champion the agenda of social justice. Issue sof social justice in the conditions of rapid unequal social transformation has taken many forms ranging from right to safe, clean water to health rights apart from broader civil rights and political rights. The political regimes, nominally democratic, are not advancing the causes of democracy by recognizing the democratic rights of the working class, poor and the marginal groups. The space of civil society activism has also shrunk. It is only the vocies of people and the progressive groups articulating the theme of social justice who are pitched against the massive forces of social transformation. The session aims to understand this dynamics so as to heighten the level of understanding and consciousness about the central issues of social justice in South Asia.
Public Sector Corruption, Inequality and Social Transformations
Ilona WYSMULEK, firstname.lastname@example.org, Institute of Philosophy and Sociology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Poland
(Session in English)
Public sector corruption constitutes one of the basic social problems that is yet far from being solved. It is one of the mechanism of social exclusion and has unequal harmful effect on different groups in society. As to recent theoretical approaches, countries with prevalent corruption are in the ‘inequality trap’, which constitutes the vicious circle of low institutional trust and high corruption perception. Corruption is often compared to contiguous disease, as perceiving widespread corruption and unfair treatment in public sector justifies and enhances own corrupt behavior. Despite advances in our knowledge about cross-country variations and harmful effects of corruption, there are many question that still remain unanswered. We encourage in this session to look at the problem of corruption from sociological perspectives, exploring the relation between corruption experiences and life situations, coming from prevailing social context and individual location within this context. This session concentrates on three main research questions: (a) What is the relation between individual social position and corruption experience in local public institutions? (b) What are the sources, new forms and mechanisms behind corruption experiences in different public introductions? (c) How do social, economic and political transformations as well as sector specific interventions impact institutional and structural corruption? This session looks for papers with comparative cross-country or cross-sector perspective, as well as papers with new theoretical framework that feature relation of institutional corruption, inequality and social transformations.
Transnational Civil Society and Environmental Governance
Yifei LI, email@example.com, New York University, China (Session in English)
Environmental protection is a central problem in international development. As environmental awareness grows globally, so does the international race for natural resources. Not surprisingly, environmental governance is becoming more contentious than ever. In this context, transnational civil society plays an increasingly salient role in global environmental politics. Some civil society organizations choose to tightly band together, often times crossing different political scales. Others form close ties with actors from the private sector. Yet others coalesce with governmental actors to advance their environmental agenda. As the transnational environmental civil society evolves, it raises important empirical and theoretical questions about justice, power, knowledge, and governance, among others. This session takes stock of empirical evidence about transnational environmental civil society from different parts of the world, and seeks to advance our understanding of transnational advocacy in the Anthropocene.
The Global Climate Crisis and the Climate and Social Justice Movements for a Just Transition
John FORAN, firstname.lastname@example.org, University of California, Santa Barbara, USA (Session in English)
In December 2015, the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change convened in Paris to finalize a global climate treaty. The resulting “Paris Agreement” is inadequate to the task of addressing the unpfrecedented global climate crisis, based as it is on non-binding voluntary national pledges, which even if all met would take global warming into the catastrophic range. Simultaneously, a sprawling climate justice movement has been growing in numbers, reach, and strength, interlinked in a vast network of networks. After Paris and now in the wake of Donald Trump’s administration in the United States, these movements are trying to scale up their efforts to put in place alternatives to both “business-as-usual” global neoliberalism and the “capitalist reformist” hopes placed in the Paris Agreement. The new social movements seek both a fair and binding global climate treaty and pathways toward deeply sustainable societies. This session asks whether it remains possible to “change everything,” as Naomi Klein puts it in her best- selling book This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. the Climate. Consisting of prominent public intellectuals, climate activists, and interdisciplinary scholars, the panel will collectively address the question: how can the global climate and social justice movements work creatively to craft action plans that address the root causes and future impacts of climate change? In doing so, we will be rethinking the most important global social movement of the 21st century, and how humanity’s response to the problem of climate change will define the conditions of life as the century wears on.
Social Problems, Development and Policy in Africa
Jonathan AMOYAW, email@example.com, University of Western Ontario, Canada
Godfred BOATENG, firstname.lastname@example.org, Northwestern University, USA
(Session in English)
Development in Africa has been hampered by a myriad of problems, which have crippled the social structure of several African countries and stifled the catching up process with the West. Gender inequality, lack of decent jobs, corruption, religious and ethnic conflicts, food insecurity, HIV/AIDS, child malnutrition, and environmental degradation are persistent in many African countries. Although these social issues have received some attention from development and academic communities, it has translated into fewer functioning and transforming policies. Many countries are plagued with dormant policies and approaches for tackling these persistent and frequently multidimensional problems. The overall goal of this session is to stimulate a critical discussion by academics and social researchers on case studies, approaches, and best practices related to the problems mentioned and examine the public policy implications for these challenges. Particularly, this session will situate problems within the context of potential policy intervention strategies. Papers are invited from individuals who are working on such initiatives, especially those that center on poverty reduction, social development, gender mainstreaming, health, policy issues, livelihood strategies, and other mechanisms that seek to improve the overall quality of life in African communities.
Tolerance in Dislocation: The Global/Local Model of the Arab Gulf States and Societies
Rima SABBAN, email@example.com, Zayed University, United Arab Emirates (Session in English)
The fast and hyper transformation in Gulf Societies and States could be a form of dislocation as Lacan characterized the “de-centered” or dislocated places by forces outside itself. This panel proposes a discussion of the speedy transformation of the Arab Gulf States and societies (Bahrain, Qatar, Oman, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates). The recent economic stagnation resulting from the drop in the oil prices has left the Gulf region with multiple models of change. The panel invites a discussion of such multiplicity from different forms of interaction: the old and the new, the global and the local, the centered and the “de-centered” etc… Such forms of fragmentations and societal ruptures/and not, could also be forms of dynamic change as scholars of the region have pointed to. The aim here is to problematize the different relationships – identities, ethnicities, believes, generations, geographies, and modalities in Gulf societies. Situated in a region burning with violence, the Gulf States (UAE particularly) are trying to lead by example. They are presented as oasis of tolerance and happiness. The question remains can the Gulf States and societies sustain such model of development? How do they maintain the current balance of diversity and dislocation? How can they resolve the multiple identities, and interconnectivity? How do such forms interact and reflect a peacefully surface of interconnectivity? Can the Gulf States present a model of peace and tolerance to the neighboring countries as they proclaim?
Next Generation of Work in Development Sociology
Samuel COHN, firstname.lastname@example.org, Texas A and M University, USA (Session in English)
This is an open session for any papers that contain innovative new theories or important new findings in development sociology. Presenters may come from any theoretical tradition, use any methodology – either quantitative or qualitative, may study any region of the world and may consider any time period including the present day. The session is a forum to present new work is that is exciting, stimulating and represents a significant advance in sociological thinking or knowledge. Papers that are good but don’t fit the standard molds are particularly welcome.
Young People’ s Aspirations, Prefigurative Politics, and the Search for Alternative Futures in the Global South
Eva GERHARZ, email@example.com, Ruhr University Bochum, Faculty of Social Science, Germany Sandrine GUKELBERGER, firstname.lastname@example.org, Sociology, Germany
Antje DANIEL, email@example.com, University Bayreuth, Germany
Deniz Gunce DEMIRHISAR, firstname.lastname@example.org, Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, Turkey
(Session in English)
Currently, we are witnessing disillusionment with development and its constitutive elements – such as modernization, democratization, and participation. Much of this is linked to a deep sense of frustration related to struggles in securing livelihoods, improving precarious working conditions, improving public services, or changing of gender orders in the Global South. Additionally, in light of the political swing to the right in Europe and the US, the grand formulas of the development narrative do not offer the same hope or venues in which to imagine a decent and safe future. By engaging in prefigurative politics, young people do not only express dissent but develop a “capacity to aspire”, through embodying forms of social relations, decision-making, and specific (sub-)cultural systems of representation. With their aim being to model imagined futures, prefigurative politics serve to provide the means to articulate aspirations in the present, and envision and experiment with alternative life-designs, gender order, and citizenships – albeit on a temporary and often highly volatile basis. This session seeks to make inquiries into this new development by using theoretically and empirically grounded insights into projects and experiences with prefigurative politics in different parts of the Global South, and to analyze the negotiations within such initiatives, which are geared towards producing alternative narratives of a “decent life”. Our aim is to investigate the tensions which emerge from the lived experience of individuals, who seek to escape the insecurity and complexity of the contemporary global economy through a utopian vision of a different society.
Call for submissions for International Sociological Association session(RC-49)
“Power, Stigma, Violence, Mental Distress, and Programmatic Responses within the Global HIV Epidemic” at the 2018 meeting
James G. Linn,Ph.D.
Despite major advances in HIV prevention and treatment, there are about
37 million infected individuals world-wide. Many of these persons with HIV
struggle with the profound mental stress associated with the stigma and
threat of violence associated with their illness. There is an increasing amount
of data suggesting that gender based violence (GBV) and the mental stress
and trauma associated with it ,is both a cause and outcome of HIV infection.
This session invites submissions which focus on programmatic responses
to HIV related stigma and violence and the mental stress and trauma associated
with them. Submissions on responses to gender based violence (GBV) and
HIV are especially welcome as are abstracts on HIV programmatic responses
in the developing areas of the world.
Section members, please submit abstracts for presentations in my session on HIV.
If you need more information, please email me (email@example.com) or call me
615-415-6943. The Toronto meeting portal for submissions is now open on the
ISA website.My session is in RC-49 of the ISA. The submission portal for
abstracts is now open on the WSSA website.
Hello, we are pleased to let you know that the new issue of the journal (Vol. 3 No. 2, Summer 2017) is now out and available HERE.
The Table of Contents for the issue is below.
Sociology of Development, Table of Contents, Vol. 3 No. 2, Summer 2017
“Double Movement in Hybrid Governance: Contestations in Market-oriented Agricultural Development”
Kristal Jones, Daniel Tobin, J. Dara Bloom
(pp. 95-115) DOI: 10.1525/sod.2017.3.2.95
“Tracing Microfinancial Value Chains: Beyond the Impasse of Debt and Development”
Erin Beck, Smitha Radhakrishnan
(pp. 116-142) DOI: 10.1525/sod.2017.3.2.116
“The Promise and Perils of Market-based Sustainability”
Jennifer Keahey, Douglas L. Murray
(pp. 143-162) DOI: 10.1525/sod.2017.3.2.143
“The Capitalist World-economy in the Longue Durée: Changing Modes of the Global Distribution of Wealth, 1500–2008”
Şahan Savaş Karataşlı
(pp. 163-196) DOI: 10.1525/sod.2017.3.2.163
We invite proposals for a paper to be presented at a workshop on “New Directions in the Study of Populism.”
The conference will take place March 15 thru March 17, 2018, at the West and Thunderbird campuses of Arizona State University (from Thursday early evening to Saturday early afternoon).
There is now a renewed academic interest in the study of populism, and a surge of empirical explorations and normative evaluations of populism. The purpose of this conference is to explore the “scope and methods” of populism studies as an interdisciplinary area of studies, and identify shared assumptions as well as normative, theoretical, methodological, and political areas or agreement and disagreement.
We plan to assemble a small group of 20 scholars who are doing cutting-edge work on populism. We are interested in putting together a mix of more experienced scholars and young scholars, and would like to bring people from different disciplines, different theoretical orientations, and who apply different methodological toolkits.
We have two keynote addresses as part of the conference. On Thursday night, Thomas Frank will give an opening lecture to a broader audience than the conference participants. On Friday night, Theda Skocpol will give a keynote presentation to a smaller group of mainly the conference attendees. Other confirmed participants include Paris Aslanidis (Yale), Jack Bratich (Rutgers), Benjamin McKean (OSU), David Meyer (UC
Irvine), and Benjamin Moffitt (Stockholm University).
Participants are expected to contribute a chapter, based on their workshop presentation, to an edited volume. By accepting this invitation you are agreeing to submit a chapter. We intend that the edited volume would serve as the entry point for scholars and graduate students who are interested in doing research on populism.
Hotel rooms are available at a conference rate of $85 (+tax) in the Thunderbird Executive Inn, which is located at the Conference site. There is no registration fee and we will provide meals for registered participants during the conference. It is worth mentioning that Arizona weather is usually particularly nice around March and participants may choose to extend their stay to enjoy the sun (or attend the baseball spring training).
If you are interested in participating in the conference (and are willing to contribute a chapter), please submit a detailed proposal describing the paper you intend to write and present at the conference, situating it in the context of your broader work, and a CV, to one of the organizers (see contact information below). The deadline for submitting a proposal is: July 1, 2017. Acceptance notification expected by August 1st.
For questions, contact a member of the organizing committee:
Carol Mueller: firstname.lastname@example.org
Majia Nadesan: email@example.com
Amit Ron: firstname.lastname@example.org